

That’s just short for JavaScript, isn’t it?
Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend time with friends.
You can reach me on mastodon @sukhmel@mastodon.online or telegram @sukhmel@tg
That’s just short for JavaScript, isn’t it?
If that’s a joke, it’s a good one. Otherwise, well, there are a lot of “this letter isn’t needed let’s throw it away,” in most cases it will not work as good as you think.
This quote from Linus is what I find inspiring hope of a future wider adoption or Rust:
Thanks. I decided to try to do the merge on my own, but failed. I came close, but it was good to have your example merge to see what I got wrong.
The pin_init becoming a crate of its own, but ‘pin::Pin’ being in the core crate ended up messing with my “monkey see, monkey do” approach to Rust merges.
I’ll learn eventually, in the meantime please do continue to give me example merges and I’ll use them as training wheels.
My girlfriend is gonna be mighty upset is she thinks I’m into that kinda thing. […] please change the image to something Gnome-related and/or trustworthy.
That’s an interesting takeaway from a DDoS issue
It’s a step in between
It then takes it a step further, as they are both 0 in that regard
I’d say that trying to get Rust everywhere is just something that is done in the hope it will help the ecosystem mature faster. It’s a bit hard to compete with languages that are 30, 40, or over 50 years old
TBF, your previous post reads to me the opposite way, like ‘it is not enough of a hate site’. Also I would offer you to look at it as a Venn diagram, if something is a hate site and more, it is still a hate site, just with extra
They started replacing the default screenshot tool with snipping tool, but maybe it’s not the default to call it with PrtScr
Saving from source was in context of saving from Instagram, I find screenshooting Web pages less fitting than getting into the source of the page, albeit the former is simpler
Doesn’t that call the same snipping tool? Anyway, saving from source may preserve quality a bit better
I was reading the comments expecting this movie to pop up. I only watched half, because it wasn’t interesting enough, but also want to re-watch because maybe I was just not ready or something ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I don’t think this operator is a real feature, tbh 😅
This is an interesting article, but I think that this standardisation is exactly for port being the same, not for pinning specific implementation of the 600+ pages long standard.
Wow what a marketing scum trick to show all compatible older generations as separate products
Maybe a rat brain project? I think the mapping of human may take longer, but yeah, once it happens interesting times are on the horizon
Also, maybe in a world where you measure anyone with money it makes sense to measure intelligence with money ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
A dog may be able to fully react and learn how to react with the exterior. But can it modify itself the way human brain can?
As per current psychology’s view, yes, even if to a smaller extent. There are problems with how we define conscience, and right now with LLMs most of the arguments are usually related to the Chinese room and philosophical zombie thought experiments, imo
I’d say that difference between nature boiling down to maths and LLMs boiling down to maths is that in LLMs it’s not the knowledge itself that is abstracted, it’s language. This makes it both more believable to us humans, because we’re wired to use language, and less suitable to actually achieve something, because it’s just language all the way down.
Would be nice if it gets us something in the long run, but I wouldn’t keep my hopes up
because I’m not interested in arguing
This sounds more toxic to me, tbf
I find this statement to be a bit contradictory to your point of ‘there is no “best” solution’
I don’t think vibe-coding is particularly good thing, but I find it completely normal for someone to just want to vibe something up and not want to understand. It’s not always a useful approach, but sometimes it might be a ‘best’ strategy, too