deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Noise in a RNG. Hungry, more likely to give into majority opinion so I can get back to brunch!
Maybe they just want a future where billionaires aren’t burning down the planet.
Course they could pick up pitchforks and take matters into their own hands. Quit blaming other people for their problems right?
I thought that was the GOP
I mean the first person to come to mind when I heard victim mentality was Donald Trump.
I think whoever framed the presumption of innocence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt felt that way.
Jurors themselves are complicated. Some people are racist, some people are just hateful, some people respect authority so much that they’ll just believe whatever the district attorney says. All of these conditions can create a situation where the jury won’t reach consensus easily .
And pretty much everybody just wants to get back to brunch and taking care of their families.
I think what you are speaking to is values. What I’m talking about is emotions as they are felt in the moment and how those will affect a jury’s outcome.
Hence people are not computers.
No
People aren’t machines and don’t weigh data the way machines do.
It’s more like this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prospect_theory
Than this.
Most of the liberals on here just want to be back at brunch. So those are the feelings you’re getting.
Personally, her hypocrisy over weed means little to me compared to the children she’s planning to help murder.
And, I’ll still vote for her because more children will die from climate change under Trump.
I’m voting against worsening climate change. Outside of that they’re both neo liberal shitheads.
So you won’t vote for someone supported by Nazis but will vote for someone supporting Nazis.
I guess hypocricy really doesn’t matter.
I did a Behavior Activation Therapy course and we used a tool similar to what you posted in the OP.
Only we listed a few activities along with how difficult we thought it would be. Each morning we would reflect on the activities we got done and write down how difficult they actually ended up (sometimes more or less). And make a new list.
The process helped me to challenge a lot of thoughts and emotions around activities.
Corporations are inherently evil.
More and more people are using speech to text. And it does show how differently people speak than write (apparently I never say my be in because, for example).
But it also means that llms aren’t only being fed text, but also speech converted into text.
This is more like her insisting you not eat cashews, because she hates cashews.
Only in this case her hate is homophobic/transphobic. Women can wear boy stuff. And men can, in theory, wear ‘queer’ stuff. As long as it’s not her partner doing it.
Cannot or will not?
So, left equals centrist I see.
Yeah I’m not a fan of it lol. Thanks though.
How does it check for bias? Because pink news isn’t left on trans issues. Yet it ranks as left with high credibility.
As well as revealing epigenetics. Which killed the nature/nurture shit.
In older mice the best telomere therapies are increasing lifespan by ~15%. Max human lifespan is currently ~120. So, if those same therapies work on old billionaires they still wouldn’t live past 150.
Models for extending life in young mice and mice zygotes hit around ~25%.
200 isn’t within our grasp currently. 150 is if the animal models work on humans. But the treatments work better the younger the animal. Working best on embryos.
Tldr: It’s unlikely today’s billionaires will live past 150 without a breakthrough in telomere research.
deleted by creator