• douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think let me has less personal stories than read it because Lemmy isn’t infested by bots writing personal stories.

    Or copying personal stories from previous posts, and recycling them for votes.

    You underestimate the amount of bot activity on Reddit. Some threads on all are something like 70%+ bot comments, with most being at least half.

    It’s crazy.

  • YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    I know I am wary of doxxing myself, there’s so many times I’ve withheld commenting because my stories are too specific. I’ve probably shared too much already and do think about just starting over with a new account sometimes. This is my 4th account by now?

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      do think about just starting over with a new account sometimes.

      That’s just a good practice. Change the handle with some regularity but it does get annoying to set everything up each time

    • gitgud@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      I suspect some are AI and others may be creative writing exercises. Some portion are probably real.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      Many of the exaggerated stories are fiction. But there are plenty of Redditors posting pictures of things they saw locally and other information which some could consider sensitive.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Don’t get me wrong, I was referencing those too. In general, when I visited Reddit there were a lot of personal stories and pictures. These can often provide a unique pov which is not found in the news.

          Lemmy is more a forum where people discuss the news. The comments are far more advanced and interesting than Reddit. But because people (including me) are far more privacy minded, I feel like they rarely post personal experiences. This might be an unfixable dillemma.

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think it might be the case for some, but mostly I think that more people on Lemmy are less focused on themselves and personal anecdotes. More often I see people here reaching for cited resources to support what they’re saying instead of “Oh one time my Uncle’s friend’s cousin…”. It still happens here, but not nearly in the same capacity from what I’ve seen.

  • Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think it’s because most of those personal stories were attention-grabbing fakes and there’s fewer incentives to do that on Lemmy

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    My name is Walter Hartwell White. I live at 308 Negra Arroyo Lane, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87104. This is my confession. If you’re watching this tape, I’m probably dead, murdered by my brother-in-law Hank Schrader. Hank has been building a meth empire for over a year now and using me as his chemist. Shortly after my 50th birthday, Hank came to me with a rather, shocking proposition. He asked that I use my chemistry knowledge to cook methamphetamine, which he would then sell using his connections in the drug world. Connections that he made through his career with the DEA. I was… astounded, I… I always thought that Hank was a very moral man and I was… thrown, confused, but I was also particularly vulnerable at the time, something he knew and took advantage of. I was reeling from a cancer diagnosis that was poised to bankrupt my family. Hank took me on a ride along, and showed me just how much money even a small meth operation could make. And I was weak. I didn’t want my family to go into financial ruin so I agreed. Every day, I think back at that moment with regret. I quickly realized that I was in way over my head, and Hank had a partner, a man named Gustavo Fring, a businessman. Hank essentially sold me into servitude to this man, and when I tried to quit, Fring threatened my family. I didn’t know where to turn. Eventually, Hank and Fring had a falling out. From what I can gather, Hank was always pushing for a greater share of the business, to which Fring flatly refused to give him, and things escalated. Fring was able to arrange, uh I guess I guess you call it a “hit” on my brother-in-law, and failed, but Hank was seriously injured, and I wound up paying his medical bills which amounted to a little over $177,000. Upon recovery, Hank was bent on revenge, working with a man named Hector Salamanca, he plotted to kill Fring, and did so. In fact, the bomb that he used was built by me, and he gave me no option in it. I have often contemplated suicide, but I’m a coward. I wanted to go to the police, but I was frightened. Hank had risen in the ranks to become the head of the Albuquerque DEA, and about that time, to keep me in line, he took my children from me. For 3 months he kept them. My wife, who up until that point, had no idea of my criminal activities, was horrified to learn what I had done, why Hank had taken our children. We were scared. I was in Hell, I hated myself for what I had brought upon my family. Recently, I tried once again to quit, to end this nightmare, and in response, he gave me this. I can’t take this anymore. I live in fear every day that Hank will kill me, or worse, hurt my family. I… All I could think to do was to make this video in hope that the world will finally see this man, for what he really is.

  • Glent@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    3 days ago

    Pffft. James Astonberry here. 1229 pike road canton ohio, 81598. 651-829-4323. Pleased to meet you.

    J/K totally pulled that outta me arse. To answer your question I personally keep identifying info to a bare minimum everywhere online. Especially with AI coming online and putting puzzle pieces together.

  • Desert Hermit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    It might also be that out of 97 million daily active users, if 1/10th of 1% are attention-seeking crazies, that’s 97,000 people over-sharing at absurd levels.

  • the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    Settinging asside the likelyhood that many personal stories there are fantacy. There are just fewer people on this platform and probably the many new people from the last little bit are still testing the waters.

    But primarily, I think nowadays people understand that if they put their data online anywhere, there is a chance someone could use it against them. Hence, people here are not doing it as much.

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’d say more likely just:

    • Not enough users to see that many stories being posted
    • Not that many users to make it worth sharing detailled stories
    • Lack of communities for that kind of content

    You’re just not gonna see a lot of tales from retail in a place dominated by chronically online people, engineers, nerds and somewhat older userbase.

  • conicalscientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dear Penthouse Forum reddit, I’m a 20 year-old college student and I never thought I’d be writing to the Penthouse Forum reddit, but…

    It’s the lowest common denominator of smut entertainment. The tech companies have managed to veil it all in prestige. It should be called gossip media or something.

    Instead people think there’s some kind of real human connection. Some kind of deep discussions happening.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Personally, that crosses my mind. But I came over in the reddit revolt and saw lemmy as a fresh start. Privacy isn’t easy, but at least make them work for it.

    Also, I figure (if it hasn’t happened already) some federated instances out there are nefarious, set up to harvest data.

    We just had a helicopter doing low passed over our house and watching the flight on a tracker, it was clear it was casing chosen neighborhoods. The lengths someone went to sell whatever info they grabbed means it’s highly valuable. The fediverse is open and waiting for it to be datamined.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Also, I figure (if it hasn’t happened already) some federated instances out there are nefarious, set up to harvest data.

      [Citations needed] or it didn’t happen. There’s precious little extra information that a “nefarious” instance can harvest that any basic web scrapper can’t.

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        [Citations needed] or it didn’t happen.

        I think this mindset is naïve and unrealistic.

        People were saying the same thing for decades in response to a small minority warning about government surveillance, often dismissing them with labels like “paranoid”. Eventually, Snowden came along and produced the citations, at extreme risk to himself and his loved ones. It’s an anomaly that they were ever revealed at all.

        History is replete with examples of bad stuff going on for ages before irrefutable evidence of it became widely known. In general, if something can be abused to someone’s advantage, it will be, and likely already is.

        There’s precious little extra information that a “nefarious” instance can harvest that any basic web scrapper can’t.

        You have a point there, but consider also that effective web scraping uses significantly more resources than having the data you want handed to you. Monitoring Lemmy through federation would be much more efficient.

      • transitinoir@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Can’t an instance also collect IP-addreses and device info, if its owner adds some scripts to its web version?

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          An instance owner can only collect the IP addresses/brower fingerprints of users logged in to their instance. In other words, only slrpnk.net could collect that information about you, because you are only directly connecting to slrpnk.net.

      • grey_maniac@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        [Citations needed] or it didn’t happen.

        This is such a bullshit challenge. I often see it used to essentially bully someone into a side issue about citations. It’s a great way to avoid discussing the original issue.

        I have knowledge (that I rarely share) that I am absolutely not going to cite, because I’m not jeopardising sources, or clearances, or violating my obligations to the official secrets act just to play someone’s status games.

        If someone makes a claim, I am perfectly able to go find the relevant citations myself, if there are any. I am more interested in the structure and content of what they’re adding to the discussion.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I often see it used to essentially bully someone into a side issue about citations. It’s a great way to avoid discussing the original issue.

          You may well have, but that’s not what I’m doing. I’m familiar with ActivityPub’s & Lemmy’s APIs, and I’m calling bullshit on OP’s hyperbolic claim without evidence or elaboration.

          • grey_maniac@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            So, from your knowledge of those APIs, this isn’t possible? I don’t need to develop a defensive protocol for it? I like to be comprehensive, especially with a potential (ideological and propaganda, if not literal) invasion from the new fascist state to my south, but if this is a low-level probability, I can put it way down my priority list.

            • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              If privacy is what you’re looking for, ActivityPub is never going to provide it, because it wasn’t designed for it and can’t be back-ported into it. You should log off and use (or create) something altogether else.

      • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Credit where due, it is just my best guess. I have no evidence.

        I simply think if you have custom code on a machine to ingest data, creating a federation interface may be more suitable and stable in the long run than a scraper. The extra server load may draw attention or run amuck with security policies designed to obscure scrapers.

        But that is certainly an option.

    • flatbield@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      An instance is not even required to access our posts and some user information. Most pages are just public.

      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah but instances are supposed to e.g. delete posts when the user deletes them. A malicious instance might not do that. Even without malice, I know this doesn’t always work because some weeks ago, I deleted a comment almost immediately after saving it, then kept getting upvotes for it; I found out this was because (at least) one very popular instance hadn’t deleted that comment, its users were still seeing it and upvoting it.

            • underisk@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Deletions have to propagate. Comments I deleted immediately after posting them still show up hours later for people on other instances. Archivers and crawlers have as many opportunities to record your deleted comment as there are lemmy instances federated to where you posted it.