• commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    yes. i would talk about the evolutionary pressures that have shaped the behavior of the organism. i wouldn’t impart volition to them.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        “spiders have evolved to produce webs. evolutionary pressures have favored species which produce webs that are safe for the organism and effective at trapping enough prey to maintain the life and reproductive cycles of the organism.”

        • idiomaddict@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          That feels much more formal to me. Definitely not incorrect, but not how I’d explain it casually to someone.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            devoid of context, your phrasing might be fine. in this context, precision is important for us to focus on the actual issue.

            • idiomaddict@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I don’t really think “milk customized for a calf” makes much of a difference for the point OP was making. Sorry, if this was kind of a waste of time, I just love that milk changes composition based on the baby’s situation and then got really interested in the linguistic limits of “design.”