• prole@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I think you have it backwards. Bibi is the reason Hamas is in power.

    Maybe there’s some truth to it the way you said it, but this is literally objective reality. He directly supported Hamas.

    • rivermonster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      There wouldn’t even be a Bibi without them. He would have lost, and Perez would have moved forward with two states and Arafat (who Hamas would have also had a harder time removing).

      The bottom line is I think we can agree they’re bedfellows, yeah? Hamas has been trying to make this conflict happen their entire existence. They want maximum Palestian casualties in the hopes of expanding the war to more nations than just their allies like Quatar, Iran, and the Houthis.

      Never look to me to defend Bibi and the Likud. Many war criminals there I’d like to see taken to the Hague.

      • cerement@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Hamas has been trying to make this conflict happen their entire existence

        Hamas wouldn’t exist without the atrocities of Israel and the IOF – Hamas was created afterwards (long afterwards)