Apparently, stealing other people’s work to create product for money is now “fair use” as according to OpenAI because they are “innovating” (stealing). Yeah. Move fast and break things, huh?

“Because copyright today covers virtually every sort of human expression—including blogposts, photographs, forum posts, scraps of software code, and government documents—it would be impossible to train today’s leading AI models without using copyrighted materials,” wrote OpenAI in the House of Lords submission.

OpenAI claimed that the authors in that lawsuit “misconceive[d] the scope of copyright, failing to take into account the limitations and exceptions (including fair use) that properly leave room for innovations like the large language models now at the forefront of artificial intelligence.”

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m the detractor here, I couldn’t give less of a shit about anything to do with intellectual property and think all copyright is bad.

    • Mnglw@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m not so much in favor of IP law as I am in favor of informed consent in every aspect of the word.

      when posting photos, art and text content years ago, I was not able to imagine it might be trained off by an AI. As such I was not able to make a decision based on informed consent if I agreed to that or not.

      Even though quotes such as “once you post it, its on the internet forever” were around, I was not aware the extend to which this reached and that had my art been vacuumed by a generative AI model (it hasnt luckily) people could create art that pretends to be created by me. Thus I could not consent

      I think this goes for a lot of artists actually, especially those who exist far more publicly than I do, who are in those databases and who are a keyword to be used in prompts. There is no possible way they could have given informed consent to that at the time they posted art/at the time they started that social media profile/youtube channel etc.

      To me, this is the real problem. I could care less about corporations.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I still think IP needs to eat shit and die. Always has, always will.

      I recently found out we could have had 3d printing 20 years earlier but patents stopped that. Cocks !