And last year they were all saying some variation on “don’t worry, AI is not going to cost anyone their jobs.”

Key take away for anyone is to never trust what an executive is saying. Much like a politician, if their lips are moving they are probably lying.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 months ago

    I agree with their outlook.

    Can we include CEOs as those positions laid off? They don’t do fuck all but save the company money, that can be done by an Excel spreadsheet.

  • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    I wonder how well an AI would be able to do a CEO’s job? Why not start with the most expensive employee?

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m pretty sure I could train an AI to make racist jokes at a board meeting. That’s halfway there already.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m actually okay with this if it results in fewer duties with the same number of jobs.

    There’s an awful lot of stuff in my job that is just tedious busy work. No human ever reads the reports I write, so they might as well not even be written by human either.

  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Reminder: the problem is 100% capitalism, 0% technology. We’ve built a truly perverse economic system in which eliminating labor hurts people.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Who’s we? In the country I grew up in, you’d get two years of unemployment benefits (90% of your previous salary), free education and free student support of $1000/month while retraining. This country runs with a surplus and one of the lowest levels of foreign debt and, no, it’s not a financial haven/tax shelter.

      It’s about how we structure society - let no one tell you otherwise, capitalism or not.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I live in the UK now which is a modern feudal state and more or less a failed state. I grew up in Denmark though, which was the country I was referring to.

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Oh I’m aware that there’s a long way to go still before rock bottom. Having lived here for 23 years, it’s only gone one direction unfortunately.

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I wanted to work in games and there was neither the degree nor the employment at the time (nowadays Copenhagen is doing quite well for the games industry). So went to study in the U.K., found a job there, met my (English) wife and had kids here. We keep dreaming about moving to Denmark, but with four kids there’s a lot of schooling to align. Maybe later.

    • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It hurst people not rich enough to be in the 1% or above. The 1% or above will benefit from it in the short term. In the long term it is going to hurt them as fewer and fewer people will be able to buy their products and services. At least for this quarter it’ll look dynamite.

      Capitalism is going to eat itself.

        • quantum_mechanic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Well, it was Jack Welch who started the braindead “line goes up” trend of making their share price raise by any means, usually layoffs. Before him, people still had jobs for life and were somwhat looked after by their employers. Behind the bastards podcast did a good episode on him.

  • eksb@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago
    1. CEO wastes a ton of money on generative AI
    2. CEO fires a bunch of people to hit quarterly profit targets

    generative AI resulted in job cuts.

    • Andy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, what’s unfortunate about CEO predictions is that they can kind of just will their expected result into being by acting on it whether it’s sound or not.

      Still, I think it’s well past time we started preparing for high surplus labor. We’re already in the early stages of post scarcity, and if we don’t embrace something like socialism, we’re getting more dystopia.

  • thejml@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Developers: I could use AI to increase my output and productivity while better testing code and coming up with unique ways to speed up runtimes!

    CEO: We could do the same output with less people!

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Looks like consulting jobs are going to be well in demand dealing with this type of bullshit from management everywhere.

  • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The findings, based on interviews with 4,702 company chiefs spread across 105 countries, point to the far-reaching impacts that AI models are expected to have on economies and societies, a topic that will feature prominently at the annual meetings.

    Once you start digging into the article it is quite hysterical what executives think a predictive chat model are going to replace. It reads more like a wish list then anything else.

    But they expect AI to replace transportation, Tesla and General Motors are not having any success with this… yet. There appears to be a bandwidth issue that isn’t going to be solved until the US upgrades to fiber.

    Boston dynamics are having a lot of success with their robots of late. Everyone else is stuck still getting robots to stack boxes. Which is also having it’s problems with bandwidth. And apparently logic issues.

    They also expect things like Energy and power/utilities to be replaced by AI. And that is just dumb. Automation has already swept through the power sector, and AI is not going to help with much else, unless it is going to start repairing power lines, transformers, or the regular substation.

    Above all, this is not taking into account the new jobs this also creates. People will need to repair and troubleshoot equipment at multiple layers.

    What is also absent from the article is the executive jobs AI will also replace. Once AI can view things at multiple levels. True, you don’t need the average worker anymore. But you don’t need someone that is just collecting a paycheck, do you? If AI will be programed to replace redundancies, then it won’t only find those at lower levels.

  • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The current AI generation tools, are tools and are still unable to replace people, simply because AI’s do not know all the requirements, do not have the over-all overview, it still makes mistakes (even if you think the code is good or even working), it’s not very creative. AI needs constant instructions as well… So in general I’m not afraid at all of these current AIs. It’s just a tool… like an editor or stackoverflow for support Q&A.