What’s America’s view on this Tucker Carlson?

    • Tom_Hanx_Hail_Satan@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah, a lot of it is outrage bait. That is basically how Trump got elected, outrage -> coverage, coverage->legitimacy.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        It is fairly significant, he’s an aggressor in a war currently affecting everything from NATO to inflation. And he has denied access to Western interviewers up until now (in recent times).

            • Tom_Hanx_Hail_Satan@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Do you not understand the backlash Tucker Carlson is getting for doing this interview? Are you not aware of his history pushing pro-putin talking points? Tucker Carlsons content literally gets reposted on Russian state medias youtube.

              • Squizzy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                I don’t understand why you replied to me about it, I am aware of who he is and the type of cunt he is.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Because our “free press” is just the “ad fee press” now. Their ONLY concern is how much they can profit off of news coverage. Outrage = clicks/views = ad revenue.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s what happens when people don’t want to pay for anything, including journalism.

          What are the first 15 comments everytime someone posts a NYT article? “oh, no, paywall, fuck the NYT, greedy Bastards what money for their work”.

          You end up with tabloids, clickbait and ad infested shit pages.

          • Urist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            No, it is just a plain defect of capitalistic monetization schemes not aligning with what is good for society. Also, for-profit news stink of corruption and bourgeoisie propaganda with added deficiency of boring clickbait tabloid shitreads more adequate as toilet paper.

              • Urist@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                We are talking about financing. You calling it “state run” only serves to reveal your own bias. It is very much possible to have non profit independent news as well as public funded news outside of politicians control. We have this in Norway, which is really fucking important because one fucking company has bought all for profit news agencies.

                Speaking of glory to the supreme leader, the company in question is also privately held like some sort of Succession fantasy.

                • Tja@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Yes, Norway, the richest country of the world per capita, a very relatable and reproducible system.

                  • Urist@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    Let us not pretend it is that much of an expense to have national public broadcast services. There is also PBS in the US, SVT in Sweden, BBC in the UK and so on. Just admit your point was pointless and the cherry picking was done on your side and move on.