UN Security Council passes resolution calling for an “immediate ceasefire” in Gaza, as US shifts position by abstaining from vote

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Passed. US Abstaining with no veto. BTW it also calls for immediate and unconditional release of hostages.

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is a pretty big shift for the US, and it means the pressure is finally starting to really register with Biden. If the “uncommited” results in the Michigan primary were enough to get his attention, recent polling that puts him 8 points behind Trump likely changed the debate for the foreseeable future.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Biden is playing diplomatic chess. Netanyahu warned the US before the vote that Israel would not participate in a meeting if the US didn’t use its veto. So, now the US didn’t. BTW, Hamas launched rockets at Ashdod right before the Security Council voted confirming its status as an equal fighting party in the war before a ceasefire.

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          7 months ago

          What you mean to tell me geopolitical diplomacy is more complicated and delicate than the people screaming “genocide Joe” think it is??? Shocking.

          • soratoyuki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            No. It means enough people screaming genocide Joe loudly enough had a small but tangible impact on American foreign policy.

              • AgentDalePoopster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                You don’t think that realizing he was pissing off his base, during an election year, has any impact on his choices?

                • catloaf@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Considering those people are not going to vote Trump over this, or probably any issue, I don’t think he cares, no.

                  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    It’s not about people changing their minds. Centrists don’t really exist. It’s about motivating people to actually fucking vote. When people vote, Dems win. When Dems are unpopular, people don’t vote and Rs win because they vote no matter what.

                  • njm1314@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    You say that but I think there’s a sizable number that already are voting for Trump

              • soratoyuki@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Certainly not, but he definitely cares about the 100,000 people that voted uncommitted in Michigan and the littany of polls that show a majority of Democratic and young voters not supporting current US foreign policy.

              • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                The uncommitted movement got 100K votes Michigan, and within days the Biden administration started a complete 180 on Israel. It’s more than a few Twitter users and he clearly cares very deeply.

            • gmtom@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              7 months ago

              No

              So you’re unironically arguing that geopolitical diplomacy IS actually simple? Really?

                • gmtom@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  That sentence isn’t relevant though is it?

                  Do you think geopolitics is that simple or nah?

                  • soratoyuki@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Of course the sentence is relevant. I’m not sure why I should bother writing a reply to you when you apparently stop reading them after the first word. Have a good day.

          • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Do you suppose that Bibi believes there are ramifications for going into Rafah now?

        • mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          So you’re saying that Biden had another motivation here: telling Netanyahu, “the US ain’t nobody’s bitch, and you don’t tell me what to do.”

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        I said elsewhere, “just in time for November.” Didn’t be fooled.

        • Maeve@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          USA because it took this many decades to merely abstain and and not veto.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            They’ve been vetoing, the proper action would have been to vote to pass.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The best time to abstain would have been decades ago, but the second-best time is now. Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good; this was a good choice.

            Edit: The downvotes are hard to interpret. Do people think the US abstaining (and thus allowing the resolution to pass) was not a good choice?

            • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              this was a good choice.

              Abstention is, by definition, the refusal to make a choice. And if you are not against oppression, then you favor the status quo.

              • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                That’s not how it actually works, though. They knew that by not opposing it would result in the measure passing. Choosing to abstain is a choice.

                  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I’m not saying there is. Obviously not.

                    To be absolutely clear for those who for some reason still aren’t understanding it at this point, choosing to abstain from voting on this resolution was the same as voting to support it. The US could have blocked this resolution and instead decided “no, we’ll let this one through.” Given that they could have blocked it but made a conscious decision not to block it, knowing that by not blocking it the resolution would pass, that was a decision in favor of this resolution.

                    What do people think I am saying, if not that?