• redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    These days there are many solutions to deploy kubernetes on a fleet of bare-metal servers, so if you use kubernetes, the option to take everything in house again is available. Distributed storage are the toughest one to setup in house but there are many mature solutions that integrate with kubernetes well these days.

    • bort@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      is stateless possible without kubernetes? (and without vendor lock in?)

      GP said:

      RE: Containers, even if you DO go that route, do you really need Kubernetes, which will come at an additional monetary and also maintenance cost? The likely answer at least initially is a big fat “no”.

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        There are self-hosted runtime such as workerd that allows you to run your own stateless lambda-like platform. It’s kinda losing steam these days though, and everyone seems to be pushing self-hosted kubernetes as the best way to get off the cloud these days.