• Jajcus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    ‘Pay to show a link’ is the way Google wants us to see this legislation. But linki are not what the news sources are fighting. The problem is Google presents the news and other information in the search result in the way that users often do not need to leave Google and foll9w the link.
    Someone produces content so people visit their się and make them money, but those users get the information they want (sometimes incomplete or broken) straight from Google and only Google gets the money. That is not fair and that is what laws like this try to fix (better or worse). But Google and such have powerful propaganda and here we are.

    Another thing is: users of services like Reddit or Lemmy also do similar thing (posting content in a way that preventing monetization at its source), so they have extra reason to take Google side.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Nope. Read the bill text. All Google has to do is link to an article for it to apply.

      https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB886/id/2758152

      (1) For each month, a covered platform shall track and record, for each eligible digital journalism provider that submits a notice pursuant to Section 3273.61, the total number of the covered platform’s internet websites that link to, display, or present that eligible digital journalism provider’s news articles, works of journalism, or other content, or portions thereof, and that the covered platform has displayed or presented to California residents.

      (2) For each month, a covered platform shall use the data collected pursuant to paragraph (1) to calculate the allocation share for each notifying eligible digital journalism provider.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You know that the preview text is decided by the sites? Facebook, Google, whoever, aren’t choosing what to display. They’re taking the stuff explicitly formatted as “please show this to make our link more attractive”. (See opengraph)

      As AI summarizers of pages really emerge this will be a more valid point, but using the preview text the authors (using a very clear format for that sole purpose) asked you to to allow users to link to their site fundamentally cannot be stealing.