• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Even the single most offending business can claim only a small percent of the total damage.

    When industries are cartelized, that’s less true. There’s a real knock-on effect between firms, such that a procedure change in a single heavyweight forces others to follow suite or divide off into niches. Classic example of this was Exxon’s adoption of Oracle database suite. Once they got on board, all their clients and partners were dragged along for the ride.

    Another great example is the provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act that throw billions into grid overhauls that prioritize green energy. Wind/Solar dipping under coal has set off a massive construction frenzy, particularly in Sunbelt states like Arizona and Texas. You can claim no single coal plant is responsible for climate change. But when a MWh of power from wind gets under coal, it doesn’t matter, because every coal plant sees a reduction in business and every wind farm sees a surge in consumption.

    All that to say, these aren’t individual problems. They are systemic. And they can only be solved systemically.

    I’ve been talking about how we are all responsible

    That’s simply not true. If everyone on my block were to throw themselves off their roofs tomorrow and reduce consumption to a flat zero, climate change would continue apace. If the senior staff at these 60 corporate plants did the same, and there was suddenly a vacuum of leadership/lobbying going into the opposition to climate change reforms, the story would be entirely different.

    We are not all responsible. Not in a privatized for-profit corporate hierarchy of an economy.

    Your argument is failing

    Your fallacy is the Tinkerbell Effect

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Your fallacy is the Tinkerbell Effect

      Despite me very explicitly and clearly saying that companies have the lions share of the responsibility, you claimed my argument, that we all have some responsibility and we should change our individual actions, was claiming it’s a “panacea.” You were the one who made up something that wasn’t there.

      I also know that my local shop is moving into a bigger space and has talked about possibly even opening a second shop. I’ve also turned friends into their products and they still shop there. Just just like companies can spread their influence by changing, so can individuals. So your claim that it’s “infinitesimal” starts to fall apart if you actually apply your own logic to yourself.

      You need to convince yourself that your actions have no affect, because it’s the only way to say you care while doing nothing. It’s how you cope with that cognitive dissonance: pretend it isn’t there.

      You’re really recognizing the fault of your own position here, it’s just the opposite of the Tinkerbell effect, where if you pretend it isn’t there, it’s not.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Despite me very explicitly and clearly saying that companies have the lions share of the responsibility

        the only one denying responsibility here is you.

        Even the single most offending business can claim only a small percent of the total damage.

        I’ve been talking about how we are all responsible

        if every individual makes the change, it would be massive.

        Uh huh.

        You need to convince yourself that your actions have no affect

        Damn this accumulated body of evidence and understanding of causality. If only I had been blessed with sweet ignorance and endless optimism.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          No one is denying it is a corporate problem too, they have the lions share of it;

          I’m not defending these companies

          And you’re trying to argue that i didn’t say this.

          It never ceases to amaze me how many people will turn to outright lying in order to avoid admitting that they might be wrong.

          If only I had been blessed with sweet ignorance and endless optimism.

          Nah, just ignorance and endless dishonesty.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            And you’re trying to argue that i didn’t say this.

            I’m pointing to all the instances in which you contradict yourself.

            And that’s been the name of this game since forever. The bait and switch of “Everyone needs to pitch in!” and “Its all on your shoulders, we can’t afford to do anything more”.

            Nah, just ignorance and endless dishonesty.

            Businesses screaming “Stop me before I kill again!” and blaming everyone else for the new pile of bodies.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I’m pointing to all the instances in which you contradict yourself.

              None of those contradicts that. Is this going to be the pattern? Just throwing dishonesty upon lies instead of just admitting you were wrong?

              The bait and switch of “Everyone needs to pitch in!” and “Its all on your shoulders, we can’t afford to do anything more”.

              No one here is baiting and switching anything. This is a desperate strawman.

              Businesses screaming “Stop me before I kill again!” and blaming everyone else for the new pile of bodies.

              This is funny. Using this context, your argument is “well businesses kill a lot more people than I do, so the few bodies i’m racking up I’m not responsible for.” It’s you blaming businesses for the bodies you’re needlessly piling up.

              Im pointing at all of our piles and saying “look, you can actually make an effort to decrease yours while we fight to decrease theirs.” You’re arguing that your pile does not count because it’s small.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                m pointing at all of our piles and saying “look, you can actually make an effort to decrease yours

                This has no impact on a problem at the scale of industry.

                If we were talking about picking up litter at the park, sure. But when we’re discussing the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, there is no solution that isn’t systematic.

                You’re arguing that your pile does not count

                It functionally does not. I can’t pollute at the scale necessary for anyone to notice, individually.

                And zeroing my pollution out does nothing to mitigate the problem.

                Even at the scale of city blocks - hundreds of people - there’s no impact.

                The only solution is systematic.

                • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  You’re making my argument for me.

                  You’re effectively arguing that there is no point in picking up your litter at the park because there is a pacific garbage patch…and man the garbage can is all the way on the other side! It’s like a full time job to throw away my litter! Me throwing away my litter is so tiny in the grand scheme of things, so it’s not my fault if I just toss it on the ground.

                  We both agree major changes need to happen. But every time you leave your litter out, you’re contributing to the problem as well and shoulder some responsibility. It’s not like throwing out your litter precludes you from pushing for systemic changes. It’s just something you can do, right now, to minimize your contribution to it.

                  And buying from places like I suggest is even more useful because it helps them thrive and spread. While I don’t see how throwing away your litter really helps it spread.

                  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    You’re effectively arguing that there is no point in picking up your litter at the park

                    I said the exact opposite