• HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah, but content creators haven’t deplatformed off YouTube. The closest might be streaming services like Nebula, but even those have subscriptions.

    YouTube pays little to content creators for hosting the content, but they also pay for hosting the content. I can’t think of a case where content creators would pay to host their videos for others to watch for free without ads or a subscription.

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      What’s most valuable to Google is the user data. Google is still able to get a lot of user data even if blockers are on. Ads are really just a way to get even more data. If you click an ad 10 times and buy something just 1 time, that information is more valuable than the ability to put ads in front of you.

        • IllNess@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I said one was more valuable. That doesn’t mean they don’t go well together.

          Anyway you can use data to nudge users. For example, Google can change search result orders. They can promote one company/research/ideology/party to the top and demote others.

          Finding out where certain people are important for law enforcement or press.

          Stores give out free wifi to track your MAC address and see where you go in stores. They sell this data, use it to track theives, or use it for better product placement.

          • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Anyway you can use data to nudge users. For example, Google can change search result orders. They can promote one company/research/ideology/party to the top and demote others.

            This is advertising.

            Finding out where certain people are important for law enforcement or press.

            This service isn’t that valuable, and extracting the value required is going to be a PR nightmare.

            Stores give out free wifi to track your MAC address and see where you go in stores. They sell this data, use it to track theives, or use it for better product placement.

            So A-B testing for their advertising?

            • IllNess@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I said one was more valuable. That doesn’t mean they don’t go well together.

              • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                But it goes back to my earlier assertion that the value of user data is generally to help with advertising.