• Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can I worry about the fact the most serious AI’s are owned by large companies, and that they are being taught to replace artists, writers and creatives?

    What a sad fucking dystopia we live in.

  • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ricky says Bill Gates needs to shut the fuck up. You have thousands of times more money than any human will ever need leave the rest of us alone you fucking demon.

  • teletext@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bill Gates says the massive power draw required for AI processing is nothing to worry about as AI will ultimately identify ways to help cut power consumption and drive the transition to sustainable energy.

    The final solution the AI comes up with: Cut the power of the poor, euthanize the old and weak.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      If it were actually AI I might have some faith.

      This isn’t a neural net processor, not a learning computer. It’s a fucking mechanical Turk. A bad one.

      What he’s talking about isn’t capable of deriving new ideas. It’s just going to spit out shit it’s seen already.

      The library of Babel is just as likely to give us the answers he’s talking about. More likely maybe because it’s at least already written down.

    • JoShmoe@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Dead wrong. AI is not as reliable as their makers would like to believe. AI is more likely to adopt all the flaws of humanity than make anything “better.” A subjective term.

    • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wow, that is so dumb. I saw some crack pot dude trying to solve unsolved physics problems by using prompts like “imagine you are Einstein, then how would you solve: …”. Good to see he is not alone, but has Bill fucking Gates with similarly dumb AI takes.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is even more dumb when even Joan f-g Rowling in her books about magic for children described how and why magic can’t do this. One of the reasons I like Harry Potter - not for the plot or the human part, but for the magic there being quite similar to computers in our time. With similar limitations, except for unique cases.

        So no matter how much one hates Rowling (I don’t, she’s done more good than evil by far still), she’s smarter and more decent than most of the humanity. That sucks.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          So no matter how much one hates Rowling (I don’t, she’s done more good than evil by far still), she’s smarter and more decent than most of the humanity. That sucks.

          Lol. She lucked into an amazing world that managed to remain a good story despite her writing, not because of it. She’s not an idiot, but literally every other piece of writing she’s ever put out kinda slams the “smarter than most of humanity” line.

  • Damage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bill Gates says the massive power draw required for AI processing is nothing to worry about as AI will ultimately identify ways to help cut power consumption and drive the transition to sustainable energy.

    We already know how

    • mutant_zz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, this is one of the many things that annoys me about AI discourse.

      “We can use it to solve climate change!”

      We already technically know how to solve climate change, but politics makes doing that impossible.

      And, no, AI can’t “fix” politics. We’re going to have to figure that out by ourselves.

      • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Climate scientists: “do these things to fix climate change”
        Everyone: “but that’s HAAARD and I don’t wanna!”
        AI developers: create AI
        Climate scientists: “AI is drawing massive power accelerating climate change, we need to stop that”
        Everyone: “but it can tell us how to fix climate change so it’s going to be okay!”
        AI climate model: “do these same things to fix climate change”
        Everyone: “but that’s HAAARD and I don’t wanna!”

        Yeah, I can’t see any way this could possibly fail…

    • Zangoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If he was counting his money in $100 bills it would still take him about 40 years,

      Edit: assuming he counts 1 $100 bill per second

  • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh, gotcha. So crypto mining is bad, because he can’t make money off of it. But AI is just fine, because he can make tons of money off of it. I understand now. Makes perfect sense.

  • sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Said a guy banging a Russian ballet dancer while married.

    Should we really listen to a guy like that?

    Epstein hooked it up for the downvoters :)

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The guy who owns the company leading the charge on AI is telling you not to worry about the power that AI uses.

    I mean it should go without saying that you should completely ignore this.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Mr anti climate change says not to worry when it benefits him.

    Fuck bill gates, fucking nepo-baby

  • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    So if we light the planet on fire to fuel the AI, the AI will then tell us how to put the fire out.

    Okay sure, but how about we just… don’t do any of that?

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Rich billionaire twat who owns a shitload of Microsoft shares says AI is good, don’t let the bubble burst. More at ten.