• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s read the article and look the causes:

    “With the rising cost of living, I don’t think people feel they can afford to, or comfortably say they want to, have children,” said 23-year-old Anna Tanaka.

    In 2020, women got married for the first time at an average age of 29.4, or 3.9 years later than in 1985, government data shows.

    As people have fewer children, they are able to spend more on each child than families have in the past. That drives up the average cost of raising a child for the broader population

    Tuition at private universities jumped fivefold between 1975 and 2021, and by 19 times at public universities, data shows.

    These are all symptoms of capitalism. Alienation and seeking “class mobility” leads to people getting married later. The cost of living is a capitalist construct, and it rises primarily due to seeking profit. Colleges are also seeking to profit, and have successfully convinced people that taking debt early in life is good for individuals going into the labor pool. The debt also increases alienation and people who would have children are suddenly priced out of it due to education debt.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s hilarious to me that you linked this as somehow a result of capitalism

      In 2020, women got married for the first time at an average age of 29.4, or 3.9 years later than in 1985, government data shows.

      As people have fewer children, they are able to spend more on each child than families have in the past. That drives up the average cost of raising a child for the broader population

      I mean the whole post is silly but this part especially is just chef’s kiss as a response to the poster above.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I explained how they were symptoms of capitalism. If you can’t understand it, then maybe you need a deeper understanding of the topic. How doesn’t it make sense?

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Having fewer children means you spend more on the fewer children, driving up average cost of raising children

          We have one President indicted 91 times so on average Presidents are indicted twice because we’ve had 46 of them.

          This is just how math works, and has nothing to do with any economic system

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            “average cost” can vary in meaning on this topic. I read it as “fewer people are buying goods necessary for children, leading to raised prices and a higher average cost of raising children”. Considering studies done on the cost of raising children, this is how I interpreted the quote. But your interpretation is also technically correct, and I won’t fault you for reading something differently than I did.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s the incorrect way to read this. Rather, people are spending more on their children, and people without children are seeing average cost of raising children.

              Effectively, the standard of living for children is going up and people who feel they cannot hit that standard of living are (in Japan’s case especially) opting not to have them.

              I assure you that poor people are still having children that survive.