• masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not.at.all.

    I’m saying it doesn’t matter if they show any goodwill or they are saints, or if they mass murder them in public.

    Bibi doesn’t care.

    Bibi, and a lot of others are genocidal maniacs.

    The only option bibi leaves is to fight back.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      They are fighting back.

      They’re also massively outgunned, so they will lose eventually. At the expense of the rest of Gazans. Why is that an acceptable outcome to you rather than a negotiated ceasefire?

      • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Because bibi DOESNT CARE.

        There will NEVER BE A NEGOTIATED CEASEFIRE.

        Bibi is fucking evil.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          3 months ago

          So, again, you’re saying just let all the Gazans die.

          Because without a negotiated ceasefire, whether you think it will happen or not (and I would love to borrow your crystal ball), that is what will happen.

          There will be no other outcome.

          That is not acceptable.

          • BassTurd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            I believe they are saying that thanks to Bibi, there can’t be a cease-fire. They aren’t advocating for them to kill the hostages or hand them all over, they are saying regardless of what happens with the hostages Bibi is going to continue to indiscriminately kill Gazans. In a tongue in cheek manner it was suggested Bibi is using the hostages as an excuse for continued attacks, so if there aren’t hostages, there’s no excuse. I don’t think that was an honest suggestion, just gallows humor. But the point is valid that Bibi doesn’t actually care about the hostages and will keep genociding to his heart’s content.

            • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Thank you for your reading comprehension skills.

              That’s exactly what I was getting at.

              Edit: I mean, I said in my first response to that (now blocked) person was"the only option bibi leaves is to fight back"

              I don’t know how that was unclear.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              3 months ago

              I don’t think they are being tongue-in-cheek at all. From all I can see, they’re saying that there will be no negotiations, period, so Hamas needs to fight until everyone is dead.

              Because, again, that is the only option I can see if there isn’t even a point in trying to negotiate. They are fighting a vastly superior force in a tiny space around a lot of innocent people.