• Q*Bert Reynolds@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    I’ve never understood the appeal of digital driver’s licenses. If I get pulled over, there’s no fucking way I’m unlocking my phone and handing it to a cop.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      As I recall, you don’t need to unlock your phone to share your ID.

      • You tap an NFC reader with your locked phone
      • The reader asks you to share certain information (for example, a bar might just ask for birthday and photo)
      • you approve the encrypted data share via biometrics
      • the share completes and returns to your Lock Screen
        • Jesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 days ago

          I haven’t been pulled over in years.

          And the digital IDs are in the second phase of a pilot program in CA. People are still required to drive with physical IDs because the readers are not widespread.

          It’s a new thing. The goal is to have readers in all sorts of places. Right not they’re basically only at airports.

          • Q*Bert Reynolds@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            Must be nice. I can’t remember the last time I drove across Louisiana and didn’t get pulled over in some podunk town whose only source of income is speeding tickets. We’ve had digital IDs here for years, and I can’t help but think that getting people to handover an unlocked phone is exactly the point.

            • Jesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              21 days ago

              Yeah, I can’t speak for Louisiana, but in CA the goal appears to be to avoid handing over unlocked phones, since that completely negates the privacy / security pitch behind digital IDs.

    • IamAnonymous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      It would be useful everywhere else, apart from when pulled over by a cop. Like at a bar, grocery / liquor store while buying drinks, airport security if TSA allows it and any store which needs your ID for pickup. No need to pull my ID out if I’m just going to pay with my phone.

      • Q*Bert Reynolds@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        All fair points. I don’t fly much and it’s been such a long time since I’ve been carded that I don’t really think about using it for stuff like that.

    • undefined@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      I don’t even remember mine unless I’m going somewhere I know doesn’t have NFC. It’s a flimsy, shitty wallet that I only bring to flimsy, shitty points of sale and I’d really like to not bring it at all.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    23 days ago

    I have too much in their ecosystem as it is. Mail. Drive. I think I’ll be skipping Wallet.

  • Dumbkid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    So now I can not have access to maps, communication, money. And identification when my phone dies. And is it really more convenient to install readers for difital licences everywhere then to just look at a licence?

    I dunno I’m old but the whole idea of having my phone store everything important seems like a bad idea. I don’t even like to do banking on my phone let alone use it as a payment method.