• Iran is helping the Houthis try to secure Russian anti-ship missiles, Reuters reported.
  • These could improve their attacks on ships in the Red Sea and threaten US warships, an expert said.
  • Two officials said Houthis met Russians twice in Tehran this year, and more meetings are coming.

Iran is helping the Houthi rebels try to secure Russian anti-ship missiles, Reuters reported, citing three Western and regional sources.

Two regional officials aware of the talks said the Houthis and Russians have met at least twice this year in Tehran, where discussions to supply the missiles were underway.

They added that more meetings are expected in the coming weeks.


Non-paywall link

  • Krono@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good.

    Iran and the Houthis are doing what every ethical nation should be doing: enforcing a trade embargo on Israel for the crime of genocide.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, you go Houthis, sink that oil tanker owned by Singapore, with a destination of Egypt, in your own waters to create an environmental catastrophe! That will really show Israel!

      • Krono@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        If any tanker tried to defy US sanctions on Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, or Russia it would be sunk the same way.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          If any tanker tried to defy US sanctions on Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, or Russia it would be sunk the same way.

          Do you know what sanctions are?

          Do you realize that there are countless tankers going to ALL of those countries, at this very moment, and have been for decades?

          • Krono@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yes none of the current sanctions regimes constitute a complete embargo. That does not change the underlying logic that they are enforced by violence.

            • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Can you give an example of a time when any of those sanctions was enforced by violence?

              • Krono@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                1 month ago

                Whenever someone is convicted of criminal export and trade sanction violations they are subject to 20 years in prison.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yes none of the current sanctions regimes constitute a complete embargo. That does not change the underlying logic that they are enforced by violence.

              … so you don’t know what sanctions are. Or, for that matter, an embargo.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I honestly think it would be boarded and detained.

          I’m not claiming the US is comparatively virtuous, I just don’t think they’d sink trade ships. Warships? Yeah.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        If it stops goods from getting to Israel then it’s a successful blockade, which does hurt Israel

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Oh, good, and the other 90% of ships they’ve attacked?

          Acceptable collateral damage. I guess it’s okay to have worse ratios of targets-to-nontargets than the fucking Israelis if you say all the right anti-imperialist words.

          • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Wait, everyone on this site has told me that even a single casualty due to collateral damage is genocide!

            • slaacaa@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              Somehow that only applies if the Jews are doing. I’m sure there is a word for that…

          • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            I don’t think anyone on those tankers deserved to die but I also know that the hundreds of thousands killed in Gaza (and the West Bank) didn’t deserve to die. Yemen is putting up a blockade and saying we will keep doing this until the genocide stops. It might be ugly but its a good cause and theyre the only country taking a stand. I applaud that. No shipping from anywhere to anywhere should go through the gulf of aden until the mass slaughter ends