• rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    It’s simple, you have a shared resource running out, nobody wants to grab less of it.

    Grab less of it yourself - the others will compensate for you. Produce some of that resource - the others will just profit from it for longer.

    The biggest emitters are too strong to be climate-crusaded, the smaller ones do successful bribing and greenwashing, but I think there will eventually be climate crusades - against those poor bastards who formally fail to do something right, but don’t really contribute meaningfully to emissions.

    Other than finding some wonderful (like in Total Recall) process to turn fossil fuels into matter practically not separable and not usable as fuel, I don’t know what one can do.

    Profitable personal mobile nuclear batteries are still not reality.

    Some new magical principle of producing energy, sufficiently decentralized (here go big NPPs). There’s none, so prepare for dark future.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      As far as energy production goes, we already have the technology: solar, wind, nuclear. We also already have the technology for cars and personAl transportation. Above all we have transit. If we can get our shit together with things we already know, we’d be in better shape. If we would have done it as little as ten years ago, we could have stayed within the Montreal targets for global warming.

      Now it’s no longer enough. We need to fix harder areas as well: aviation, shipping, grid storage, steel and cement, etc, and we need it asap … how is there still not any urgency?

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        You need technology cheaper than fossil fuels. Some of fossil fuels’ downsides are upsides for some people (political control), which necessitates the difference in cost by a big enough margin to counter those invisible benefits. A revolution.

        There’s no urgency, I think, because Earth’s population is going to start shrinking. The emissions are going to slow down for that reason.

        Countries that won’t have some quality, not quantity, approaches to their economies by then are going to fall hard.

        I guess that’s how EU is going to make the world owned by Europeans again.