• Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Let me get this straight:

    1. Person A makes a social network
    2. People flock to it
    3. Person A sells the social network to person B
    4. Networks does a 180, destroying communitie; people outraged.
    5. Same person A makes a social network
    6. People flock to it.
    7. [surely we can predict what is going to happen here, right?]
    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      This doesn’t really change your point at all, but I remember reading the tech news surrounding the Twitter sale to Musk as it was happening. If memory serves, Musk literally made the $420/share purchase offer as a joke, a joke that several lawsuits were filed to decide it was a serious and legally binding offer.

      He memed his way into owning Twitter against his will, and then burned down everything to assuage his ego. But because he’s a goddamn billionaire there are literally no repercussions.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    is bluesky privately owned? What is preventing this whole thing just happening again?

  • Nima@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    there’s quite a few people in this thread with the same weird vitriol as reddit had.

    if someone uses bluesky and you don’t, then why make yourself upset over it? i have both mastodon and bluesky. i use both.

    I’m not sure why everything has to be a weird competition. some weird us vs. them shitfight.

    its literally just a social media platform. jeez.

    • krimson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Because I have seen 10 posts about how Bluesky is the new Twitter on my Lemmy feed in two days. I overreacted a bit, but what you say goes both ways. Absolutely use what you like but there is no need to spam a new platform like that.

      • Nima@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        its because of all the new accounts that have been made there. that’s likely why you’re seeing so many posts about it.

        a mass exodus from one twitter to another is a big deal for a lot of people.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        The same happened when everyone moved over from Dig to Reddit back in the day. It’s really annoying for like 2 weeks with everyone talking about it, and then it calmed down.

        • rozodru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          2 weeks? it was a lot longer than that. I mean hell there was a god damn multi-part comic about the “war” between digg and reddit. early reddit was a cringefest.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I do remember there was a sub about it. Don’t remember it infecting much beyond that though after the first few weeks. Perhaps I’m misremembering.

    • llii@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      its literally just a social media platform. jeez.

      And we know what kind of control the platform owners have. “Just” doesn’t cut it I think.

  • MrFunkEdude@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I love that the people who weren’t smart enough to leave Twitter two years ago are now eagerly jumping from one frying pan into another.

    Fortunately there have been a few who learned their lessons a bit late and came over to Mastodon.

    But the rest of them? The one who tolerated the racism and misogyny that Musk brought with his red pilled idiots? Let them have Blue Sky and the rest of us can watch as history eventually repeats itself.

  • Rakenclaw@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    My only interest regarding Bluesky is i don’t care about Bluesky. Long live Mastodon, Lemmy, Fedia, and the rest of the Fediverse!

  • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Lol, Blusky fan boys are quite active today. I’m sure this millionnaire’s toy will be better than the previous one, good luck.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      The way I look at it, I know it’s probably going to end up being shit in the end, but it’ll be a few years until that happens, and it will be fun in the meantime.

      Just because you know I’ll have to leave at some point doesn’t mean that you don’t enjoy the party while it lasts

      • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        And then what? You’ll move to Truth social? Then Thread? And then to X2? Meanwhile there’s a decentralize alternative that gives back the control to users, you’re welcome to join.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          I don’t think it’d have to be either or. People can join both or just one it doesn’t really matter, If it ends up being another dumpster fire then people will move off just like they did X.

          Most people will go where most of the people are going and that’s blue sky not Mastodon.

          • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            I disagree. People that didn’t left twitter when Musk took over are like people who didn’t vote in the US election: enablers. In my opinion, if you accept to take part in the nazi shithole that X is, you are in the end validating it’s existence.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              What are you disagreeing with exactly because I didn’t say anything about X.

              I’m taking about Mastodon versus bluesky

              • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                I think joining bluesky is validating another for-profit business that will do anything to profit from it’s userbase. Like facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Titktok, etc. the ONLY goal of capitalist business is to generate profit, so they will throw you under the bus the very second they think they can make more money by doing do. But yeah, you’re free to join bluesky until it becomes so shitty that you’ll want to join the shinny new capitalist alternative, created by the exact same people lol.

  • Brylant@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Just because democrats are leaving Twitter, this doesn’t make it dead in the slightest sense of the word

    • s_s@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The feetdraggers will slowly, begrudgingly follow–as always.

        • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Lemmy is an echo chamber you make yourself tho. There are no algorithms that push certain content to you. Obviously, if you only lurk on shit like hexbear, my condolences, but I don’t feel like Lemmy is an echo chamber, at least much less than reddit was.

            • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Dunno. Unless they just output feeds in chronological order and maybe add some filter which I have explicitly defined myself, I’m not trusting any algorithms.

          • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            Echo chambers are not dependent on having an algorithmic feed. It just matters that the people you talk with and the information you consume, etc, filter out dissenting opinions from what you hold.

            Lemmy is still very much an echo chamber simply by virtue of the people who tend to be here. But we can balance that with time spent on other platforms, IRL relationships, etc.

          • PlainSimpleGarak@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            An echo chamber is an echo chamber. Whether natural or artificial. Lemmy is extremely one sided. Dissenting opinions are not tolerated nor welcome (from a political standpoint). Perhaps less so than reddit as Lemmy user base is much smaller.