A controversy over a waterfall has cascaded into a social media storm in China, even prompting an explanation from the water body itself.

A hiker posted a video that showed the flow of water from Yuntai Mountain Waterfall - billed as China’s tallest uninterrupted waterfall - was coming from a pipe built high into the rock face.

The clip has been liked more than 70,000 times since it was first posted on Monday. Operators of the Yuntai tourism park said that they made the “small enhancement” during the dry season so visitors would feel that their trip had been worthwhile.

“The one about how I went through all the hardship to the source of Yuntai Waterfall only to see a pipe,” the caption of the video posted by user “Farisvov” reads.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    People will really jump on any random thing to bash China. I’ll give kudos to British state media that this constant deluge of insignificant nonsense makes it really hard to have any discussion about China that’s based on like, broad trends in history or economics.

    Parks do water management. At Niagra Falls, for example, much of the water is used for power generation at night, but during the day more of it goes over the falls for the benefit of tourists. You’ve probably never heard about it, because it doesn’t matter. At all.

    But make it about another tribe, about the outgroup, and suddenly it’s the most important thing in the world and proves everything we always suspected and blah blah blah. Go volunteer at your local park.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Speak for yourself, as far as I’m concerned China has lost all credibility with this story. Faking a waterfall ? That’s grounds for economic sanctions

            • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              No, China’s current economy is not communist. Nothing to do with Mao, or what I think about communism personally.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I guess I’m just confused then. When China enacted economic reforms in the 80’s, there were people who opposed them and felt that these reforms entailed a right-wing deviation from communism. Those people were/are known as Maoist hardliners. You can see where I thought you might be one.

                If you’re not that, then does that mean you do approve of those economic reforms? Perhaps I misunderstood, when you said China abandoned communism, did you mean it as a good thing, and you support China’s direction from a pro-capitalist standpoint?

                If that’s not it, I give up. I’m afraid I’m at a loss what your ideology is or what you think about Chinese history or the country’s economic reforms. If you could explain it to me, I’d be quite grateful, I see a lot of people around here who appear to me to be Maoists, but when I ask if they are, they don’t answer or elaborate. It’s very confusing to me.

                • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Why do you need to know the other commenters ideology, their stance on China’s direction, history, and economic reforms, as well as on capitalism?
                  All they said was that China’s economy isn’t currently communist, which is true whether you like it or not.

                  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    Because I’m trying to understand their perspective. I consider China to be communist in the sense that the people in charge are communists, the same sense that it was communist under Mao. They call themselves communists, they explain their reasons for doing things from the perspective of communist ideology, they teach Marxism in schools, etc.

                    To say that they are specifically no longer communist, when they claim to be, seems to be weighing in on what communism is and isn’t. Specifically, it seems to be taking the perspective that Mao’s leadership constituted “real” communism while Deng’s leadership constituted “fake” communism. As I am not a Maoist, I disagree with that perspective.

                    It’s strange to me that you think understanding someone’s stance on China’s economic reforms, the point in history where they allegedly abandoned communism, would be irrelevant to understanding the standard by which they consider China to have abandoned communism. What could be more relevant?

                • nomous@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You should comment less and lurk moar and you’ll pick up the vibe.

                  Or just keep trying to corner people and wonder why they don’t want to engage with you.

                  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I guess I don’t really operate on vibes too much when looking at geopolitics.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The video was posted on Weibo by a hiker, which suggests the hiker is Chinese. So blame the Chinese for making this known since they then viewed and shared it thousands of times.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        You say “thousands” as if that’s a lot. If some Chinese people want to talk about a park’s water management, I don’t mind. But when Westerners take some random trivial thing like this and use it to fuel a narrative that “China is a country full of lies,” or whatever, that’s an entirely different animal. This is a local issue, not an excuse for chauvanists to be chauvanist.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes, I do call 70,000 shares a lot. That’s shares, not views. I’m not sure why you don’t.

          And it’s still the Chinese people making a big deal about this.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Really? Because what I’m seeing is an article from the British Broadcasting Channel and a thread full of people using this story to make sweeping generalizations about China, in English. I suppose it’s possible, but I gotta say I find it a little hard to believe that this thread is full of Chinese nationals, as you’re claiming.

            • samus12345@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              this thread is full of Chinese nationals, as you’re claiming.

              Where was that claimed?

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Right here?

                And it’s still the Chinese people making a big deal about this.

                I’m talking about what people in this thread are saying, and in response they said it’s Chinese people making a big deal about it, so naturally that would imply that this thread is full of primarily Chinese people.

                • samus12345@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  They said it’s Chinese people IN CHINA making a big deal about it, which is what this article is about.

                  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    And I’m fine with that. What I’m less fine with are people in this thread, about a BBC article, exploiting a local issue about water management to paint an entire country as being full of liars. If Chinese people want to make a big deal out of it, that’s their business.

                    Nobody in this thread cares about it for the story itself. They care about it because it gives them an excuse to push their agenda.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        Being a tankie is when you don’t care about water management at a park on the opposite side of the world, even though your state hates their state.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          As opposed to what you’re doing which is just apologizing for a corrupt government?

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Contrary to popular belief, there’s actually nothing wrong with calling out bad arguments and illegitimate or irrelevant criticism of anything or anyone, regardless of what you think about the thing or person. I’ll apologize for whoever I please, in other words.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Last I checked, Buffalo wasn’t pumping water up the falls just to make it roll down through the turbines, but if you have legit sources showing otherwise I’d be most happy to see them comrade

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        They do control the amount of water that flows down the falls. I was there last year. They also come right out and say so.

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Bit of a difference between a weir/hydroelectric dam and a pump that would take all the water from the turbines and send it right back up to the canucks, using the turbine energy.

          Then again, maybe it would spur a new round of waterfall barrel daredevils if they knew their keys would just be churned up top like a bowling ball at a “natural wonder”

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Where did I claim they were? I believe what I said is “Parks do water management.” And beauty and tourism are concerns that they take into account. This is a non-story.